|



"Sauber's Unsung
Hero"
David Tremayne
interviewed Johnny at the Charity
Karting Challenge in
November 1997 for the following article, which appeared
in the 4th December 1997 issue of the UK's weekly
motorsport magazine, Autosport. It is reproduced
by kind permission of David Tremayne and Autosport.
For
split seconds in Melbourne, Johnny Herbert's fans
envisaged their hero fighting for the lead of the
Australian Grand Prix, until Eddie Irvine's lunge down
the inside of the field at the first corner helped
Herbert and Jacques Villeneuve into the early trudge
home. Sauber had just cemented its deal for Ferrari
engine supply, and Herbert's super-quick start seemed to
presage good things - but that incident somehow came to
summarise what became a season that failed, largely, to
deliver. Plenty of promise on paper, but much of it
unrealised.
Herbert ponders his season calmly, as karts drone in
the background at The Raceway at King's Cross during his
annual charity bash. He's relaxed, in an element he has
always enjoyed since childhood. When he talks of the
year, he does so without rancour or implied criticism;
just telling it like he sees it. It's clear that he
remains confident that Peter Sauber's team has the
potential to do the business.
"Hungary (where the Englishman placed third)
was a good result at the end of the day - our best of
the year," he begins. "But the car still
wasn't that competitive. I actually thought some of
the earlier races were better. Imola looked like
being my best race, as far as the actual driving was
concerned, until Spa. Barcelona wasn't too bad. I
drove sensibly with the tyres in Barcelona, Canada
and Hungary. The latter was another case of looking
after the tyres, not an out-and-out race. I did well
in all the races where you had to be sensible and
look after the tyres! But, overall, I guess Spa was
probably the best race. It was a good
one."
It seemed that every time Herbert got a decent result,
somebody else did something better and got the limelight.
In Barcelona Jacques Villeneuve's tyre-conserving victory
won the plaudits; in Montreal, David Coulthard's
near-miss and Olivier Panis's accident overshadowed him;
in Hungary, it was Damon Hill in the Arrows; and at Spa,
people only had eyes for Michael Schumacher, though they
both started on intermediates. Herbert smirks when you
ask him if it annoys him that he didn't often get due
credit.
"Well, it's always the same, really" he
shrugs nonchalantly, well beyond being hurt
emotionally these days. "When I read the Spa
reports, Michael was the only one on intermediates.
Nobody else. But he wasn't the only other one, there
were a couple more. And I didn't know anything about
the safety car!
"The first lap was quite had because it was
damn wet, but the second was marginally better. But
you had to be very careful, although it cleared up
quite quickly. But that's normal at Spa! Jacques was
a second quicker than 1 was, but I was still quick. I
held up Heinz (Harald Frentzen) for a bit early on.
The car wasn't bad. It was a more competitive race,
but we'd had too many races where we'd been better
than we were in others. But at the time of Spa, we
were generally struggling quite badly, so I was
pleased to go so well there. I think the last
properly competitive run we'd had was Silverstone,
really.
"What Spa gave me was the best satisfaction
of a job well done, because of those tricky early
laps on the intermediates, and choosing them in the
first place - I certainly wasn't aware of what the
pace car was going to do. I just thought that had to
he the best way because at Spa it never normally
rains twice. It just rains once and then when it
starts to dry up it means it's going to blow over.
You could see the blue sky coming. And yes, it was
nice to beat Jacques. Perhaps that proved something,
I don't know."
But there were low points.
"Yeah, Australia was a disappointment, of
course, but we were competitive so I wasn't
particularly worried that I'd lost a race,' says
Herbert. 'Monaco was a bit that way too, but again we
were still going well at that point. However, when we
went to Austria we really struggled, and I qualified
somewhere like 15th on soft tyres. Terrible!
Fortunately, in the race, I again looked after the
first set of tyres and was quite quick, relatively
speaking halfway through on the old tyres that were
blistered! That was probably the lowest point, on a
circuit where we should have been okay because there
are very few corners."
Herbert shouldered a lot of weight for the team as it
struggled with a succession of second drivers, but it
only made his relationship with Sauber even stronger.
"It's been good, and as usual everyone tried
so hard," he says. "I had that with Heinz,
of course, and that had always been my one worry when
I went to Sauber, after my time with Michael
(Schumacher) at Benetton. They make me feel wanted,
which is important.
"They had difficulty because they had all the
to-ing and fro-ing with the second driver, which
didn't help the team or me because there was too much
emphasis on trying to organise what was going on
there at times. The thing we all know we have to
learn next year is that the development has to carry
on. We lost out on developing the car a bit, because
we never had any of the braking things, and we only
had the 3-D throttle system that modulates the torque
of the engine right at the end."
The arrival of Jean Alesi puts Herbert at an
interesting crossroads, but he says he isn't bothered
about heat from a quick team-mate. Perhaps, as was the
case when he and Mika Hakkinen traded qualifying honours
together in their Lotus days, it's what he needs.
"It's never bothered me, and so long as
things stay fair, which I know they will, I don't
have a problem. I'll get along with anyone," he
says.
For his part, Alesi is looking forward to the
partnership, and the Frenchman couldn't have found a
better replacement for Gerhard Berger. "If Johnny is
the man I'm told he is, "Jean says, "I really
can't see us having a problem. Everyone says he is not
political."
Indeed he is not, but like most F1 drivers Johnny has
mixed views on the 1998 regulations.
"During the last big test at Silverstone I
tried an interim Sauber C16, with the narrow
suspension and grooved tyres, and it was an
interesting experience," he remarks. "The
car felt pretty much as I had expected it to, very
loose and nervous, but it was much easier to drive
than the current cars. By that I mean that you seem
to have so much more time to set it up into a corner.
"Normally you do everything in a corner in a
very short space of time - that's what an Fl car
should be about. It should be hard mentally and
physically. You should be able to brake late and
downshift and then go through the corner very fast.
That's what sorts the men from the boys.
"The problem with the new cars, in my
opinion, is that they give you far too much time, and
they're too easy to drive as a result. They're quite
fun, but the braking distances aren't that much
different to the 1997 cars and I don't think they're
going to make much difference in overtaking
opportunities, either.
"The cars drift like Formula 3000s, but they
will only go to a certain angle," he adds.
"Once you get beyond that angle you go beyond
the point at which the undertray works. So the cars
are very snappy because of the aerodynamic effect and
will spin quite easily. But that's probably something
the designers can sort out with the pukka '98 cars,
rather than with this year's models modified.
"I think when it comes to racing the '98 cars
it's going to be much easier physically, and sadly I
think a lot of the challenge for the driver will be
missing because of that. I hope I'm proved wrong, but
I don't think I will be. I'm looking forward to 1998.
In some ways I think the grooved tyres may benefit
me, and it could benefit the car. But I still don't
think it's the way Fl should he going. But, of
course, I'm going to be quite happy if we're
quick."
Herbert also shares the view of the majority of
drivers that FIA president Max Mosley got it wrong when,
in explaining the 'futility' of banning Schumacher for
1998 after his display in Jerez, he said that he didn't
think there was any point because there is not a driver
out there who would not risk a ban for 1999 if he thought
he could win the 1998 World Championship by, effectively,
resorting to skulduggery. Herbert thinks about the
situation for a while before venturing an opinion.
"Well, it's something that, at the end of the
day, people have been able to do," he says.
"You know, we had the thing in Suzuka in 1990
with Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost." More
thought. "But I don't think I would do that.
With me, it would only be something where I would,
say, take a risk to overtake. I wouldn't actually
drive someone off the track, nothing deliberate or
blatant. Not like Jerez."
Nothing instinctive then, let alone premeditated. He
pauses again, thinking the point through.
"You know, I would have disagreed that
Michael's driving there was deliberate, except that
if you look at it, the very, very first movement is
turning away, and then he decided to do it and turned
into Jacques. He actually made a big mistake to leave
that gap! Jacques did a good move because he was
actually a long way back."
Nor is he sure that the punishment was apposite.
"In some ways I agree that you can't ban him.
The public wants to see drivers like Michael. But
starting the year on minus points say 10 points down
- might not have been a bad idea. That in some ways
wouldn't have been a bad way of doing it. I mean,
losing second place in the World Championship was no
big deal, was it? Not to a man who only wants to
finish first anyway."
So apart from not pushing other drivers off the track,
what other aspirations does Herbert have for 1998?
"Well, I think it will be quite good for
me," he begins, with understated confidence,
"because there will be that little element of
having to look after the tyres, though it all depends
what Goodyear comes up with. I have a feeling the
tyres will be too hard to let drivers slide the cars
around, which will again suit me.
"To me the tyre fight will be all about what
happens if Bridgestone is quicker than Goodyear. If
so, Goodyear will have to make the tyres softer - but
when they wear out they will go to sticks quicker,
even though the FIA says the tyres must not be better
in that state. So if it gets to that stage they'll
stick another groove in and we'll end up with slicks
again! I don't know, it's going to be an interesting
story on the tyre front.
"Overall, I guess my expectations are
basically similar to what they were in 1997, which is
to be in the points and consistently on the
podium," Herbert concludes. "I'm not
looking at winning at the moment. Once you are
consistently on the podium, then you can be looking
winning. I think that's a realistic enough outlook to
start with."
Herbert still keeps in touch
with karting via his charity Challenge
There's something fitting about the Johnny Herbert
Karting Challenge, held annually at The Raceway, Kings
Cross, in aid of SPARKS (Sport Aiding Medical Research
for Kids). Karting gave Herbert his start, and steered
him towards high earning capacity and the Monegasque
lifestyle. Like most race drivers, he still looks good on
one of the little tubular racers, and to watch him out on
the track is to appreciate the racing art. A week fast
Saturday Herbert staged the fourth Challenge, an event in
which members of the Johnny Herbert Fan Club can turn up
and take on their hero, wheel-to-wheel, after making a
suitable donation to SPARKS. If they're lucky, they can
also pitch a few so-called celebrities off.
But why do it? Johnny smiles.
"It was my father, Bob, who first mentioned
the idea of doing something for the Fan Club and
letting people have the chance to come and race me.
It's always done around the time of the BRDC dinner,
because all the other drivers are over. And it's good
for charity, because I don't have the time to do
these sorts of things during the season. Everyone
enjoys it.
"It's relaxing," he adds. "It's not
highly competitive. And it's a good way to give
something back to the sport. Karting is where I
started, with Bill Sisley down at Buckmore Park, and
I owe a lot to the sport.
"The Challenge now has a really good
reputation and karting is a very, very good thing for
young kids to start in. Or even adults.
"These advanced safety courses, to me, are a
complete waste of time because the way they teach you
to drive is a complete nonsense as far as I am
concerned. I watched something the other day on TV
where they were simulating a chase, and the way they
we re feeding the steering wheel - they still drive
that way! - is dangerous. When you read about police
drivers having crashes, I'm sure that 99% of it is
through shuffling the wheel! Whatever they say, you
can't do it. If you could, we would have been
shuffling the wheel in racing cars years ago."
This uncharacteristic rant is finally punctuated by
the typical Herbert laugh:
"Karting is good. It gives you a sense of
control. It's similar to a car, but in some ways more
difficult because it is more precise and the steering
reacts quicker Even for people who don't want to be
racing drivers, it gives them the chance to enjoy
themselves."
The above article is
reproduced by kind permission of David Tremayne.
This article may not reproduced, in whole or in part, without
permission.
© David Tremayne and Autosport. All rights reserved.
This page prepared 13th December1997.
|